yes the problem is the automout scrip , just turn off the automout service
http://www.desipro.de/ddwrt/
Build r18730 +++++++++++
New:
Samba updated to 3.6
Minidlna updated to 1.0.24
ntfs-3g updated
New 3/4G Modems supported
Fixed: opkg complaining about architecture
I will disable the Optware automount script and report back with the outcome. Thanks.
Just curious, why was my previous post deleted?
Linksys E3000, DD-WRT v24-sp2 std (c) 2012 Release: 03/17/12 (SVN revision: 18730M) Kong
I noticed that opkg now seems to work. Running 'opkg update' create a list of installable packages from the Openwrt repository without any error messages. Curious if someone have installed and tested a package from this repository?
I've noticed that previously installed packages with ipkg-opt are marked as uninstalled in the opkg-list.
Update: I tried installing the editor nano as a test. Installation works fine but after installation nano is just available from the installed dir /opt/usr/bin & by entering ./nano not just 'nano'. Runs fine though. The path includes /usr/bin?
I dont have automount from optware, I only use the automount through the ddwrt web page. Plugging a usb device in causes minidlna to shutdown. This is how I fixed it:
-copied /tmp/minidlna.conf to my hard disk (at /mnt)
-created an executable script called S40minidlna in opt/etc/init.d with the lines
#!/bin/sh
nice -n -15 /usr/sbin/minidlna -f /mnt/minidlna.conf
-disabled minidlna from the webgui
wabe said: I noticed that opkg now seems to work. Running 'opkg update' create a list of installable packages from the Openwrt repository without any error messages. Curious if someone have installed and tested a package from this repository? I've noticed that previously installed packages with ipkg-opt are marked as uninstalled in the opkg-list. Update: I tried installing the editor nano as a test. Installation works fine but after installation nano is just available from the installed dir /opt/usr/bin & by entering ./nano not just 'nano'. Runs fine though. The path includes /usr/bin?
If you execute command:
env
you should see:
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/jffs/sbin:/jffs/bin:/jffs/usr/sbin:/jffs/usr/bin:/mmc/sbin:/mmc/bin:/mmc/usr/sbin:/mmc/usr/bin:/opt/sbin:/opt/bin:/opt/usr/sbin:/opt/usr/bin
so it should work
@slobodan, I checked minidlna vob support and there hasn't been any change. Could be a bug in the newer minidlna version. I haven't checked dhcp with linux boxes yet.
@KongE3000, sounds like this is due to the dd-wrt change that also broke some NAT functionality. This should be fixed by dd-wrt along with my fix I already added to trac
what about wireless signal problems? Iv rolled back to 17865 till the new drivers are fixed
Kong:
Output of my 'env' command is as follows:
login as: root
DD-WRT v24-sp2 king (c) 2012 NewMedia-NET GmbH
Release: 03/17/12 (SVN revision: 18730M)
Enhanced with OTRW
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib:/jffs/lib:/jffs/usr/lib:/jffs/usr/local/lib:/mmc/lib:/mmc/usr/lib:/opt/lib:/opt/usr/lib
PATH=/opt/bin:/opt/sbin:/opt/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/jffs/sbin:/jffs/bin:/jffs/usr/sbin:/jffs/usr/bin:/mmc/sbin:/mmc/bin:/mmc/usr/sbin:/mmc/usr/bin
i.e /opt/usr/bin is missing in the path
Copying the nano executable to /opt/bin takes care of it. I can easily fix this in my startup file but it might be a good idea to include /opt/usr/bin in the path for future builds.
@ wabe
Since you run OTRW
Modify /opt/etc/init.d/S01bashAsShell
Thats the script which sets both PATHS
basmaf
basmaf said: @ wabe Since you run OTRW Modify /opt/etc/init.d/S01bashAsShell Thats the script which sets both PATHS basmaf
I changed S05chngProfile, worked too. Do you know if this change is 'global' i.e work for all of Fraters scripts? I noticed that almost all his scripts contains a path-statement.
I think he just wanted to be sure path was set correctly so he sets it in all scripts.
It's global since it's an export.
Don't know the effect of setting path in other scripts. would need to reboot and check what is does.
have to check.
Edit:
Editing the echo line into .profile does the trick
Edit on the export patch does not work, sorry
echo 'export PATH=/opt/bin:/opt/sbin:/opt/usr/bin:/opt/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/jffs/sbin:/jffs/bin:/jffs/usr/sbin:/jffs/usr/bin:/mmc/sbin:/mmc/bin:/mmc/usr/sbin:/mmc/usr/bin' > /tmp/root/.profile
Hi, I think I have solved the DNSMasq with Linux problem:
First, in Security / Firewall uncheck Filter WAN NAT Redirection. Click Apply.
Second, in Services / Services check Use NVRAM for client lease DB, set Used Domain to LAN and WLAN, type your domain in LAN Domain.
Set DNSMasq Enable, Local DNS Enable, No DNS Rebind Enable, and under Additional DNSMasq Options type:
local=/yourdomainname/
expand-hosts
user=root
(Take care: no domain=yourdomainname entry!)
Click Apply.
Third, under Setup / Basic Setup choose:
DHCP Type: DHCP Server
DHCP Server Enable
Check Use DNSMasq for DHCP, Use DNSMasq for DNS and DHCP-Authoritative. Click Apply.
slobodan said: Hi, I think I have solved the DNSMasq with Linux problem: First, in Security / Firewall uncheck Filter WAN NAT Redirection. Click Apply. Second, in Services / Services check Use NVRAM for client lease DB, set Used Domain to LAN and WLAN, type your domain in LAN Domain. Set DNSMasq Enable, Local DNS Enable, No DNS Rebind Enable, and under Additional DNSMasq Options type: local=/yourdomainname/ expand-hosts user=root (Take care: no domain=yourdomainname entry!) Click Apply. Third, under Setup / Basic Setup choose: DHCP Type: DHCP Server DHCP Server Enable Check Use DNSMasq for DHCP, Use DNSMasq for DNS and DHCP-Authoritative. Click Apply.
I'm not entirely familiar with this problem - what are the symptoms? My router is basically setup as you describe except for the "additional DNSMasq Options". I have a couple of Linux boxes attached and haven't had any issues.
You should probably be a bit more clear about how to input "type your domain in LAN Domain" and "local=/yourdomainname" and give an example.
Pardon the noobish question but can't find this info anywhere.
Can I flash the stdkong - build 18050M or 18730 file (usb-ftp-samba3-vpn-nv60k-broadcom.bin) to my Linksys E2000 (Converted WRT320N)
I know it work on E3000s but what about E2000 ? From readme "Builds labeled nv60k are suitable for Linksys E3000 / 4200"
So guess E2000 is no go.
cheers /pennred
wabe said:
I'm not entirely familiar with this problem - what are the symptoms? My router is basically setup as you describe except for the "additional DNSMasq Options". I have a couple of Linux boxes attached and haven't had any issues. You should probably be a bit more clear about how to input "type your domain in LAN Domain" and "local=/yourdomainname" and give an example.
It is so that Block WAN NAT Redirection blocks 0.0.0.0, i.e. one of the calls used by DNSMasq. udhcpd has no such problem since it does not obey iptables rules. I noticed that in some cases DNSMasq does not want to start unless it has the option user=root.
As for that option, try:
local=/example.mywebsite.com/
or
local=/lan/
pennred said: Pardon the noobish question but can't find this info anywhere. Can I flash the stdkong - build 18050M or 18730 file (usb-ftp-samba3-vpn-nv60k-broadcom.bin) to my Linksys E2000 (Converted WRT320N) I know it work on E3000s but what about E2000 ? From readme "Builds labeled nv60k are suitable for Linksys E3000 / 4200" So guess E2000 is no go. cheers /pennredI'm not sure. Ask this in the forum at dd-wrt.com. My two cents are: if you are able to flash it with a DD-WRT nv60k build, then recent Kong builds should also work, since they don't radically differ from DD-WRT standard builds. According to http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Linksys_E2000 , your router accepts nv60k builds, if you know how to flash them. But I would stay with DD-WRT 14929 unless you need miniDLNA or such.
My present Additional DNSMasq options:
bogus-priv
domain-needed
local=/yourdomainname/
expand-hosts
user=root
Thanks slobodan
I have tested DD-WRT nv60k builds without any problems.
My goal is to find best firmware for wireless 5GHz-only, 40MHz band width. I've been running 15962 on my E2000s and it is OK better than 17990, 18000 and 18024.. I'm just trying new builds to attempt to boost the wireless performance.
Someone at DD-WRT forum with E3000 said thet he run stdkong - build 18050M for few weeks now and have only positive comments about it.
My problem is that wireless link speed is around 162Mbps with DD-WRT builds as reported by Windows 7 on laptop in same room as router.
Compared to around 250-300Mbps on stock firmware (FW_E2000_1.0.04.007_US_20101201_code.bin).
For some odd reason on stock firmware only the lower four channels as 36, 40, 44, and 48 are available.
File download over wireless connection is also much faster on stock firmware.
But stock firmware substantially reduces the distance from router where I can get speed around 54Mbps. I have to bump Tx power to 100mW (this can be done only on DD-WRT) only than I get decent connection in other room 12m from router and wall between them. When I'm close to router 60mW seems to work best.
2.4GHz is no option for me because it is overcrowded with people are all over the channels. Got my other router working somehow on channel 13.
cheers /pennred
Hi, pennred. Stock firmware uses Fast-NAT, DD-WRT uses NAT. Fast-NAT is much faster than NAT, but it is much harder to configure. I think that disabling the firewall of the router is a bad choice, but if your router is already behind a firewall, you could think of disabling the firewall of your E2000 and then compare connection speed.
Hi slobodan
Well I didn't want to "Hijack" this thread with unnecessary details. But my router is behind a IPcop 2.0.4 firewall.
During my test firewall of E2000 was disabled if you mean Security -> Firewall -> Firewall Protection -> SPI Firewall (Disable).
As I understand DD-WRT use driver from linsys, mybe new driver in FW_E2000_1.0.04.007_US work just better for 5GHz. Or you need to play more "Advanced Wireless Settings" that are not available in GUI
Btw is there a way to look what parameters stock firmware use eg.
# wl ver,
# wl interference?
cheers /pennred
Hi, pennred. I don't know if you could telnet to stock firmware. Perhaps you could do it with serial or JTAG, but that's for those who know how to hack a router. Kong has adopted new wireless drivers in his recents builds, see the log at http://desipro.de/ddwrt/Changelog /p>
So, if you think that the older drivers worked better, you could downgrade your Kong version to a version from before introducing the new drivers.
Naa I'll will play with TX Power. When I'm close to router 60mW and when I go to other room behind wall 12m from router 100mW. Well 5GHz has a shorter range and does not penetrate walls well I just didin't know it will be that much worse. The 2.4Ghz band is strong thru out the house, no issues with signal strength.
cheers /pennred
Hello Kong,
Opkg still seems to be partially broken.
'opkg update' downloads the list of packages, but then 'opkg list' displays nothing.
I also have a suspicion that at least some packages rely upon /etc being writable. At least, when I tried installing the USBIP set of packages, the configuration stage complained about a missing shell script in /etc, which I think was supposed to come from one of the dependencies. I managed to circumvent it by manually editing the *.postinst files, but the installation still seems to be incomplete. I am investigating the situation, time permitting.
By the way, the USBIP package (http://usbip.sourceforge.net/) seems to be a very useful thing to include in the distribution anyway - it allows you to share physical USB devices of any type over an IP network.
yes, i tried to install mc and nano and opkg downloads packages, says it's installing to root and then ash prompt. when i run with debug option their are no errors displayed. list and list-installed do not work. can't run nano or mc with ./nano or nano. nano not found. don't see the executable anywhere in file system.
also, i can't get minidlna to work but i think it's just mount locations and paths that are the problem. all three external disc partitions mount to /mnt/disc0-part1 /mnt/disc0-part2 and /mnt/disc0-part3. i find this confusing. i designated these in web gui as /mnt /opt and /jffs. how is opkg supposed to install my downloaded packages to the external, mounted /opt if it is mounted under /mnt as disc0-part2? is it supposed to be like this and i'm supposed to do some post configuring or did i misconfigure something prior to mounting, or is this a bug?
so far all the rest seems to be fine. and thanks.
Cleatus:
Have you checked that the partitions are indeed mounted as "mnt", "opt"?
nano is installed in /opt/usr/bin if everything is set up correctly.
This dir need also be in the path. If not you should still be able to execute
by typing "./nano" in this dir.
thanks wabe.
all three partitions are mounted to /tmp/mnt. see below:
Disk 0:
--- /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
Block device, size 1.819 TiB (2000398933504 bytes)
DOS/MBR partition map
Partition 1: 884 MiB (926941184 bytes, 1810432 sectors from 2048)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
Volume name "/jffs"
UUID 80F2EA1D-D178-412E-B951-567D100BC44A (DCE, v4)
Volume size 884 MiB (926941184 bytes, 226304 blocks of 4 KiB)
Partition 2: 1.253 GiB (1345323008 bytes, 2627584 sectors from 3904401408)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
Volume name "/opt"
UUID FE971300-3111-4859-91A0-1296A106AEF8 (DCE, v4)
Volume size 1.253 GiB (1345323008 bytes, 328448 blocks of 4 KiB)
Partition 3: 1.817 TiB (1998125531136 bytes, 3902588928 sectors from 1812480)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
Volume name "/_media"
UUID 22D8EC78-D971-4764-85B5-9E52D1447557 (DCE, v4)
Last mounted at "/media/_media"
Volume size 1.817 TiB (1998125531136 bytes, 487823616 blocks of 4 KiB)
Mountpoints:
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 mounted to /tmp/mnt/disc0-part1
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 mounted to /tmp/mnt/disc0-part2
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 mounted to /tmp/mnt/disc0-part3

RSS
